NaiTazi.com: Pakistani news. Powered by YOU!

India-Pakistan nuclear war would spell global calamity: study

April 8th, 2008 Sana · 4 Comments

Source: Thaindian News

By Parveen Chopra

New York, April 8 (IANS) A brief nuclear war between India and Pakistan would rip apart the ozone layer and unleash global devastation - killing millions, besides triggering catastrophic health problems, according to a study by US scientists. Using sophisticated computer modelling, University of Colorado scientists Micahel Mills and Owen Brian Toon have showed that a nuclear war between the two South Asian neighbours, involving 100 Hiroshima-sized nuclear devices, would ignite urban fires and blast five million tonnes of soot 80 km into the air.

The soot would absorb enough solar radiation to heat surrounding gases, setting in motion a series of chemical reactions that would break down the stratospheric ozone layer, which protects the earth from harmful ultraviolet radiation.

“The scenario of a war between India and Pakistan was used as a representative of regional nuclear conflict, potential for which remains high with the increase in nuclear arsenal and the number of nuclear armed nations,” Mills, who led the study published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in the US, told IANS.

Mills is a research associate with the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics at the Boulder-based university’s Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences. Toon is the director of the department.

India and Pakistan are known to possess the smallest arsenals of the eight nuclear-armed powers. India has about 60 nuclear devices and Pakistan under 50. A nuclear exchange involving a hundred 15 kiloton, Hiroshima-type weapons is only 0.03 percent of the total explosive power of the world’s nuclear arsenal, Toon said.

Mills said their research found that the catastrophic impact from even a small nuclear conflict would be much larger than estimated earlier from a bigger nuclear war, when simulation was not that sophisticated. The indirect human casualties elsewhere in the world would be many times more than those who actually die from the war.

“We would see a dramatic drop in ozone levels that would persist for many years,” he said. “At mid-latitudes the ozone decrease would be up to 40 percent, which could have huge effects on human health and on terrestrial, aquatic and marine ecosystems.”

The upper stratosphere, heated by massive smoke injections, would accelerate catalytic reaction cycles, particularly reactions of nitrogen oxide gases that destroy ozone.

“By adopting the Montreal Protocol in 1987, society demonstrated it was unwilling to tolerate a small percentage of ozone loss because of serious health risks,” said Toon.

“But ozone loss from a limited nuclear exchange would be more than an order of magnitude larger than ozone loss from the release of gases like CFCs.”

The ozone losses predicted in the study are much larger than losses estimated in previous “nuclear winter” and “ultraviolet spring” scenario calculations following nuclear conflicts.

A 1985 National Research Council Report in the US predicted a global nuclear exchange involving thousands of megatons of explosions, rather than the 1.5 megatons assumed in the Mills-Toon study, would deplete only 17 percent of the Northern Hemisphere’s stratospheric ozone, which would recover by half in three years.

But the new study said ailments like cataracts and skin cancer, as well as damage to plants, animals and ecosystems at mid-latitudes would likely rise sharply as ozone levels decreased and allowed more harmful UV light to reach earth.

Mills said the next step for researchers would be to study the biological impact of the nuclear war scenario, which will damage all organisms, on land and on ocean, thus polluting the food chain.

E-mail this article





 E-mail this article to a friend



Tags: , , ,

Filed Under: Politics

Other posts by Sana

4 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Unintended Consequences « A Dark and Sinister Force for Good // Dec 2, 2008 at 6:10 am

    […] Now, public opinion in India is demanding an energetic response from their government. The US is trying very hard to keep the two nuclear-armed countries from going for each others’ throats, and so are the civilian governments of both India and Pakistan. If another blatant Pakistan-based terrosit attack occurs in the near future, India’s government might be forced to respond militarily- such as by mobilizing reserves and moving troops to the Pakistani border. Pakistan would be forced to respond in kind. A few more atrocities by hot-heads on either side of the border could easily precipitate a shooting war. India could crush Pakistan in a conventional fight, and both countries know it. Pakistan could very easily end up using nuclear weapons to defeat India’s vastly superior conventional military. This could very easily result in a full-scale nuclear exchange. Here’s an excellent article on the probabilities and possible consequences. […]

  • 2 Triple Curve Collapse Function « e-Watchman Blog // Apr 11, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    […] Right on cue, with the new American president coming into office in a few weeks, numerous hotspots around the world are erupting – the most ominous being the massing of troops on both sides of the borders of nuclear-armed India and Pakistan. The consequences of a nuclear war between the two nations would be a global catastrophe. […]

  • 3 RICHARD HUTLEY // Dec 24, 2009 at 3:28 am

    ITS ABOUT TIME THESE COUNTRIES GREW UP AND STOPPED ARGUEING ABOUT WHO OWNS THIS BLADE OF GRASS OR THAT BLADE OF GRASS OR WHAT RELIGEON THEY ARE.I THINK THESE PEOPLE GET UP IN A MORNING AND THINK INDIA HAS GOT THAT GOAT I WANT IT , LETS NUKE INDIA. ITS IMMATURE BOLLOCKS AND IT GETS ON MY NERVES THERE IS ENOUGH HURT IN THE WORLD WITHOUT US ALL ARGUEING IT WILL PROB END UP WITH KOREANS RUSSIA AMERICA GETTING INVOLVED AND ALSO CHINA HELLO WORLD WAR 3 MERRY CHRISTMAS

  • 4 Nawaz // Dec 24, 2009 at 10:57 pm

    RICHARD HUTLEY, nobody is starting a nuclear war - at least not the Indians or pakistanis.

    This article is about a US study - incidently the only nation to have actually used atomic weapons - speculating as to what could happen if India and Pakistan were press the red button.

    The study could just as easily be based upon the US repeating what it has done in the past, but on a much larger scale.

    The purpose of these weapons is deterrence, not annihilation - ask Saddam. Oops, sorry the US kiled him because he didn’t have any.

    Nawaz. Angry Man Of Pakistani Origin.

Leave a Comment