NaiTazi.com: Pakistani news. Powered by YOU!

Former Pakistani prime minister’s party quits Cabinet

May 13th, 2008 Aimon · 3 Comments

Source: San Diego Union Tribune
Former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif pulled his party from the Cabinet yesterday, raising doubts over the new government’s stability and Pakistan’s transition to democracy after eight years of military rule.

The ruling coalition that came to power after February elections – dealing a crushing defeat to allies of President Pervez Musharraf – could now flounder. Its two key partners cannot agree over how to restore senior judges removed by the former military strongman late last year.
Sharif said his group would still support the government led by the party of Asif Ali Zardari on an “issue by issue” basis, but Sharif indicated that he would join protests by lawyers lobbying for the restoration of the judges.

A permanent split in the coalition would help Musharraf, a longtime ally in the U.S.-led war on terror.

Also, the 53-nation Commonwealth, composed mainly of Britain and its former colonies, cited Pakistan’s progress in restoring democracy in lifting the country’s suspension from the group, imposed after Musharraf instituted emergency rule in November.

E-mail this article





 E-mail this article to a friend



Tags: , , , ,

Filed Under: Politics

Other posts by Aimon

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Ilyas khan baloch // May 14, 2008 at 7:10 pm

    Dear Sir/Madam,
    Where are we going ….?

    Muhammad Ali Jinnah, The FATHER OF NATION, in his 11 August 1947 Speech to the Constituent Assembly made it adequately clear that it would be a comprehensive and pluralistic democracy promising equal rights for all citizens regardless of religion, caste or creed, Pakistan was born as democratic state. In fact it has been failure of Pakistan socio-political system ,where in, Pakistani people are left at distant from the corridor of power so that the ruling elite, can do what they wanted to do in favors of their interest, leaving the Pakistani people at the mercy of circumstances. As this policy is denial of right of Pakistani people to rule their country according to their aspiration and desire to build this country, which can provide equal opportunity to all without any discrimination for the establishment of welfare society the dream never, come true till today.

    Because of corrupt politician of Pakistan the army was tempted again and again to place for one after another military rule. It would be wrong to blame Pakistan army wholly for having usurped power for more than half of its life. It was in fact feudal corrupt politician that facilitated first martial law in Pakistan.

    There can be no denying that Chief of CIA and his brother John Foster Dulles who was then Secretary of State who played key role in bringing Pakistan under martial law the feudal politician were responsible for the army rule. As unfolding the situation that brought Pakistan under martial law. Altaf Gauhar, biographer of Ayub Khan writes, Americans convinced their friend Iskander Mirza to handover power to Ayub Khan on 7 October 1958. Had there been shrewd political leadership in Pakistan in 1958, perhaps democracy would have taken firm roots in our country. Again, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto shown eagerness and patience during 7 March 1977 elections not to speak of Pakistan coming under martial law, perhaps, would have been alive and ruling at present. He would have most likely won a majority, even if not two thirds of majority. Apparently it was again weak handling of the post-Kargil war situation by political leadership that catapulted General Musharraf to power.
    .
    However, it is not for the first time that people of Pakistan have spoken in favors of democracy, but whenever they got a break, they manifested their faith in democracy, so they did it on 18 February 2008, but did it work, no, therefore in order to get rid of socio-economic grievances we need to change the system at large. We did not have any outcome during change of faces since last 60 years. Is this not enough for a nation or do we need more humiliation or loss to the nation before we learn the lesson ?

    The Political leadership in Pakistan needs to understand that it was people’s anger against the establishment that went into the ballot-boxes, and not one but all the political parties that have benefited from the popular rise, be obliged it to the voting public to work in combination, because no single party is in a position to go it alone. It seems that the wisdom from past mistakes has distilled upon Pakistan leadership and there is all likelihood of emergence of a national consensus for running of the country.
    It will be difficult to expect any thing positive at this stage because, return of political leadership of PPP and PML(N) to Pakistan was subject to condition, political coalition cannot take creative action or dare to change policy of the national interest till general Musharaf is as president, current government need to take patriotic political decision in the interest of Pakistan without fear of American anger or their commitment and support during mediation process with USA.

    Presidents and Prime Minister have come and gone in the past but it did not make a difference, regarding President Musharaf role about Country , there can be no two opinions as to whose, approach was proper or in the interest of people of Pakistan. No political party that was in the election arena raised a finger against the centralized power in the hands of one person or few of them Nobody talk about to empower the Pakistani at grass route level, why? Because they to, want to grab, total power in their own hand so how politician differ from musharaf mean all eggs are one and the same in the basket.

    We have already lost the major part of Pakistan in 1971 simply to save the centralized sole power in the hands of ruling elite to exploit this country by the ruling leaders they let the country break in part then allowing the masses to rule this country democratically. In the present circumstances we are again dragging our sovereignty at stack for the external interest in the name of national interest, instead of our interest i.e. the interest of Pakistani people at large.

    That mean only the society base on tolerance, equality and justice can be the real guarantee for the prosperous and strong Pakistan there for your intent is invited to the crucial movement which could be the point of distraction or disaster.

    The only way -out of these crucial circumstances is to empower the common Pakistani at grass route level i.e. the change of system. This change is inevitable for the prosperous Pakistan .As a citizen of this country I have try to provide an alternate socio-political system to empower the masses at grass route level for rapid industrial and agriculture development with transparency and accountability in the system. Along with basic guarantees for the creation of welfare state, where in public representative and institution shall be answerable and accountable to the masses. I alone cannot make the change but together we can turn the table, and make the dream come true.

    See…www.idp.org.pk

    Ilyas khan Baloch
    Organizer, Islamic Democratic Party

  • 2 najmi // May 14, 2008 at 11:38 pm

    dear baloch,
    i like u r ideas
    q for u
    wat will be your first order if u b,com prime minister of pakistan

  • 3 Ilyas khan baloch // May 15, 2008 at 12:41 am

    Dear Brother Najmi,

    kindly refer Islamic democratic party web site ,www.idp.org.pk
    Thank you for appreciation
    iKBaloch

Leave a Comment