4 responses so far ↓

• 1 allahwadhaiodino // Jun 9, 2008 at 3:37 pm

  Musharraf ‘ address to senior journalists is actually the first charge sheet to the Political Govt. and at the same time it can be considered a challenge for the coalition partners to take action under Art. 6 of the Constitution if they can. Actually , one phone call of Bush has made Mr Mush.very bold and haughty and now he is flying very high in the air under the false impression that nothing could befall on him as far as US is with him. He is also mistaken to think that Mr. Zardari can not follow the path of his Impeachment as per the commitment made by him in the NRO of which Mr. Bush is the Guarantor . His impression appears to be near to reality as Mr. Zardari always takes the shelter under the Reconciliatory position when News Reporters ask about Impeachment of Mush.viza viz the clear cut stand taken by PML(N). We can refer press conference Mr Zardari in Jedda in witch the reporter when asked in reference to his recent statement about the Resignation of Mush. , Mr. Zardari at once backtracked and started talking of Reconciliation with the President instead of taking clear cut stand on Impeachment of President as of Mr. Sharif. Mr Mush is confident that Zardari can’t do that otherwise the Guarantor will enforce the Artc. of NRO which may be more fatal than 58/2B. In L/R Progamme of GEO tv. of overnight, I think Mr Hassan Nisar was also referring to this type of situation when he was also challenging the other party regarding removal of Mr. Mush. The only alternative left for removal of Mush. is the Long March of 12 June for which the Lawyers have to Gherio Mr. Mush without any National damage till his Aeroplane is seen flying off the Chaklala Airport or The Action of Almighty .

• 2 Lubna // Jun 14, 2008 at 4:38 pm

  ha, allahwadhaiodino,
  We all know that this current gov, inclusive of Sharifs is full of liars and corrupts. A nation which keep her silence on having Zardari as her leader is doomed for disaster.
  Peoples Party, and PML(N) came back with written scripts, and they are just acting on it. I rule Punjab, and you rule fed, then I rule fed next 5. Try to remember BB’s statement in press only few months back, when she mentioned this agreement with N-Sharif.
  Whereas Mush is concerned, you are right, he is not going anywhere in the presence of NRO. It will only happen if Judges give “safe path” to zardari regarding NRO. If that happens then Zardi won’t mind being the king next day.

• 3 Jerry // Jun 20, 2008 at 9:54 am

  Since Obama disclosed that he visited Pakistan in 1981, and one of his chaparones (for a mere three or four days of three weeks visit), was recently transition Prime Minister, Mian Muhammadimian Soomro, perhaps Musharraf knows what happened on that tour in 1981.
  Perhaps he knows, and is quite willing to lay it all out if Obama, who many feel will be the American President in 2009, if Obama keeps whacking at what a nasty cur he is. If Obama fails to punch again at Musharraf, that might be a possible reason for Musharraf’s resurgent unwillingness to “resign.”
  Pakistani news sources could provide more depth and breadth on what we know about that trip. Context is vital to understand what, exactly, was the tone of the times in 1981, in Pakistan. Why Karachi? Why Hyderabad (India or Pakistan is still unclear)? Why Jacobabad? Any other places? What Muslim clerics might have had a following of such a note that Pakistani men were willing to travel somewhere in Pakistan to see or hear him speak? Who were the charismatic figures in Pakistan then? Would Obama have been able to move from Pakistan to India and back again, easily?
  The world wants to know more details, but amazingly, everyone (Chandoo Brothers; Hamid Walid; Hal Sadiqqi; Soomro boys; father Soomro), all claim they cannot speak about the trip. Odd, because Obama has clearly shown he intends to attack Pakistani camps which might harbor pro-Taliban or Taliban fighters seeking refuge in remote border regions. In such cases, it would seem clear that previous American attacks on supposedly “solid intelligence targets” inside Pakistan have simply resulted in claims of al-Qaeda killed … but also, demonstrations that legitimate Pakistani civilians were part of the “collateral damage” the U.S. could care less about.
  If Obama gets in, he will follow up with what he says, because he will be SO incredibly beholden to so many Ultra Liberals in America, that he won’t be able to NOT attack Pakistani targets after 20 January, 2009. I fail to see how keeping his trip to Pakistan in 1981 is so important that the public, at large (globally) shouldn’t know the full details.

• 4 leo // Jun 20, 2008 at 11:22 am

  DONT WORRY OBAMA IS NOT GOING TO WIN PRESIDENCY,WE KNOW AMERICANS VERY WELL

Leave a Comment